Tracked companies

31 platforms, 96 documents, 25 App Store labels — snapshotted daily at 06:17 UTC. Statuses assessed 26 Jul 2026; how they're assigned.

Scans under the EU's Chat Control 5

The derogation's mandatory reports exist only for providers actually scanning private communications under it. Exactly five filed them, for both 2023 and 2024, per the Commission's own implementation report — this is Chat Control use, documented by the EU itself.

Scans globally — no EU evidence 13

Their documents disclose content scanning under US law (NCMEC reporting, PhotoDNA). No evidence found that they invoke the EU derogation for private communications — US-law scanning and Chat Control are separate regimes. Absence of evidence is a fact about the public record, not proof of absence: a provider could scan and not disclose it.

No clear statement 3

Not end-to-end encrypted, so the provider can read the content — and no public statement about scanning private communications was found either way. Each of these pages shows the full search behind that finding: the vocabulary looked for, the documents searched, and every match in context. Silence measures disclosure, not behaviour.

States it does not scan 1

The company publicly states that it does not scan message content.

End-to-end encrypted — out of scope 9

Content is end-to-end encrypted; E2EE communications are formally excluded from Chat Control's voluntary scanning.

Institutional sources 3

The law's own pages, archived under the same rules as everyone else's — no scanning status, because these aren't providers; they're the paper trail.

Currently untrackable

These pages block automated archiving; the block itself is the recorded fact.